NO ONE. This word applies to men, women and children who are called natural persons. In law, man and person are not exactly synonymous concepts. Every person is a man, whether he is a member of society or not, regardless of the rank he holds, regardless of age, sex, etc. A person is a person who is considered according to the rank he occupies in society, with all the rights to which the place he occupies and the duties it imposes on him. 1 bouv. Inst. No. 137.
2. It is also used to refer to a society that is an artificial person. 1 Bl. comm. 123; 4 Bing. 669; C. 33 Eng. C.
L R. 488; Forests. 116; Ferry. We. 57; 1 Mod. 164. 3. However, where the word `persons` is used in legal acts, natural persons shall be used, unless something appears in relation to the fact that they are legal persons. 1 Fraud. No.
178. 4. Natural persons are divided into men or men; and women or women. Men are capable of all kinds of obligations and functions, unless it is done for reasons that apply to certain people. Women may not be appointed to public office or to civilian functions other than those expressly permitted by law. Civil Code by Louis. 25. 5. They are also sometimes divided into free people and slaves. Free persons are those who have preserved their natural freedom, that is, who have the right to do what is not forbidden by law. A slave is someone who is in the power of a master to whom he belongs.
Slaves are sometimes ordered not by people, but by things. But sometimes they are seen as persons, for example, a black person in contemplation of the law is a person in order to be able to commit an uprising in conjunction with white men. 1 bay, 358. 6. People are equally divided into citizens (see below) and foreigners (see below) when viewed according to their political rights. Considered from the point of view of their civil rights, they are alive or dead civilly; civil death vacuum; Outlaw; and well-known people. 7. People are divided into legitimate and bastards when they are tested for their rights from birth. 8. In their family relations, they are divided into parents and children; husbands and wives; guardians and wards; and master and servant son, as it is understood in the law, see 1 Toull.
No. 168; 1 bouv. Inst. n. 1890, Anm. Partly on the basis of the principle that corporations are simply organizations of natural persons, and partly on the basis of the history of the legal interpretation of the word “person,” the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that certain constitutional rights protect corporations (such as corporations and other organizations). Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad is sometimes cited for this statement because the court reporter`s comments included a statement by the Chief Justice made before the hearing began, telling counsel during pre-trial preparation that “the court does not wish to hear arguments as to whether the provision of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits a State from denying equal protection of the law to any person within its jurisdiction applies to such corporations.
We all agree that this is the case. The teaching has been attributed to Pope Innocent IV, who seems at least to have helped spread the idea of persona ficta, as it is called in Latin. In canon law, the doctrine of persona ficta allowed monasteries to have a separate legal existence from monks, which simplified the difficulty of balancing the need for these groups to have infrastructure, even if monks took a vow of personal poverty. Another effect of this was that a monastery as a fictitious person could not be convicted of the crime because it had no soul, which helped protect the organization from non-contractual obligations to the surrounding communities. This effectively transferred this responsibility to the people acting within the organization, while protecting the structure itself, as individuals could be seen as moving and therefore negligent and excommunicated. [18] Section 28 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 states: “. the provisions of this Bill of Rights apply, to the extent possible, for the benefit of all legal persons and all natural persons. The term “interested person” means heirs, heirs, children, spouses, creditors, beneficiaries and any other person who has an ownership right or claim in a fiduciary estate or the estate of a deceased, ward or protected person. It also refers to personal representatives and trustees.
According to Indian law, “shebaitship” is the property belonging to the deity or idol as a “legal person”. People who are destined to act in the name of divinity are called “shebait”. A shebait acts as guardian or guardian of the deity to protect the right of the deity and fulfill the legal duties of the deity. Shebait is similar to a trustee if the deity or temple has a legally registered trust or legal entity. According to Hindu law, goods given or offered as rituals or gifts, etc. absolutely belong to the deity and not to the shebait. The case studies are “Profulla Chrone Requitte vs Satya Chorone Requitte”, AIR 1979 SC 1682 (1686): (1979) 3 SCC 409: (1979) 3 SCR 431. (ii)” and “Shambhu Charan Shukla vs Thakur Ladli Radha Chandra Madan Gopalji Maharaj, AIR 1985 SC 905 (909): (1985) 2 SCC 524: (1985) 3 SCR 372”. [24] The falsity of Lavery has only become more evident over time and thus even more legally indefensible.
In the future, Black`s Law Dictionary will no longer be the obstacle it was in the fight to guarantee the fundamental rights of nonhuman animals. Instead, we expect it to become a powerful asset in future court cases that cannot be ignored. A legal or legal person (Latin: persona ficta; also a legal person) has a legal name and has certain legal rights, protections, privileges, responsibilities and obligations, similar to those of a natural person. The concept of legal person is a fundamental legal fiction.