As the title of the article suggests, today we are talking about the principle of legality. We warn that it is not a question of transforming this space into a chair of law, but simply of providing a simple explanation of the chosen subject. Velásquez, F. V. (2012). The flexibility of the principle of legality and crimes that aggravate humanity. Cuadernos de derecho penal, (7): 91-105 doi.org/10.22518/20271743.399 defines the principle of legality as the fact that, on the basis of popular sovereignty, each branch and organ of the State exercises regulated power; in such a way that all the constituted powers of the Republic are exercised under the conditions enshrined in the Constitution, so that the only sovereign is the people. Barber, N. (2017). The parent? Application of the principle of legality in international criminal law. Nuevo Foro Penal, 13(89), 156-173. The main application of the principle of legality in administrative law is its power to impose sanctions.
This implies that the assignment of the public administration to the sanction can only be made by law. The political constitution of Colombia is endowed with a wide range of fundamental rights, guaranteed by the courts, binding on all the powers of the State, including the legislative power, expressed by constitutional legal norms that take precedence over others of the order, constitutional model that determines the option of a guaranteed criminal law, or the minimum. This research aims to analyse the principle of protecting legitimate expectations in police trials for violations of urban integrity; First, from a description of the concepts and origins of the principle of legality and trust, as well as their constitutional and legal evolution. In addition, the study on the concept of. As the Constitutional Court has indoctrinated, the principle of legality can be supported by the following two aspects: Alexy, R. (2003). Drei Schriften über Grundrechte und Prinzipientheorie. Externado de Colombia University. This article deals with an overview of two fundamental concepts for understanding the dynamics of administrative law and constitutional law, considering it from the scope of the principle of legality when the latter is integrated into a State governed by the rule of law, implies that it is considered as a principle of constitutionality in the light of which one of the The correct application of the principle of proportionality in disciplinary matters has led to a number of conflicts for the disciplinary judge in the punishment of judicial officials, who sometimes represent a strong tension with other legal and constitutional principles, which is why this document seeks to determine whether they are currently applicable. FEMICIDE. CRIMINALIZATION OF THE MURDER OF A WOMAN BECAUSE OF HER STATUS AS A WOMAN.
Allegation of unconstitutionality against section 104 A (partly) and 104 B (partly), literals a) and g) (partly) of Law 599 of 2000, added by sections 2 and 3, literals a) and g) of Law 1761 of 2015, by which the criminal type of femicide is created as an autonomous crime and others are dictated. The principle of legality as a guiding principle in the exercise of State powers to limit rights derives from articles 6, 29 and 122 of the Constitution and implies that civil servants may only do what is expressly prescribed, clearly and precisely prescribed, defined or established in the legal system. In this way, (i) human dignity is protected by recognizing the ability of individuals to adapt their behaviour to the requirements of norms; (ii) arbitrariness, which is so alien to the concept of the rule of law, is avoided; (iii) equality in the application of rules is ensured, thereby strengthening the legitimacy of the State; and (iv) reinforces the idea that, in a State governed by the rule of law, the general principle is freedom. CRIMES AGAINST ANIMALS. BEHAVIOUR THAT SERIOUSLY HARMS THE PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL INTEGRITY OF ANIMALS. Unconstitutionality actions against Article 5 (partially) of Law 1774 of 2016, which promulgates the Civil Code, Law 84 of 1989, the Criminal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure and other provisions. One of the claims claims that. Santa Cruz, J. C.
(1999). Principle of legality, typicity and objective attribution. Akademie der Magistratie, 2: 149-163. repositorio.amag.edu.pe/handle/123456789/321 obliges the principle of legality to be applied in the procedures for sanctions arising from this Code, in the sense that it is a question of investigating and punishing conduct described as vitiated by irregularities in the law in force at the time of its application. (Clause 4) As regards the principle of legality, the Court recalled that its mandatory nature in disciplinary matters results from the application of several constitutional provisions. In particular, it provided that it is enshrined in the Constitution, mainly articles 6 and 29, which stipulate that civil servants may be tried only in accordance with existing laws and that they are only responsible for violations of the Constitution and the law. On the other hand, articles 122 and 123 provide that, in the performance of their duties, civil servants must submit to the conduct described by the Constitution, the law and the regulations and that there may in no case be employment in the civil service that does not have functions provided for by law or regulation. And finally, to article 124, which gives the legislator the normative power to create, modify or abolish the regime of liability to which public officials are subject.
The latter provision provides as follows: The law determines the responsibility of civil servants and the manner in which it is to be applied.