There are different types of legal documents, the most important and comprehensive of which include: birth certificate, voter card, certificate of studies, CURP, passport, title and professional card, military card, driver`s license among many others. On the other hand, it should be noted that administrative or legal documents, as they are common knowledge, are a formal written communication used in public and private administrations to enable me to comply with the obligations and enjoy the rights recognized by the laws and regulations of any institution or institution. A typical example of legal representation is the representation of minor children by their parents under parental supervision. [Note 1] [1] [2] Vicki Schultz[3] notes that collectively, we have a common knowledge of most concepts. The way we interpret the reality of our actual understanding of a concept manifests itself through the various individual narratives we tell about the origins and meanings of a particular concept. The difference in the narratives, about the same set of facts, is what divides us. An individual has the ability to shape or understand something completely different from the next person. Evidence does not always lead to a clear attribution of the specific cause or meaning of a problem – meanings are derived through narratives. Reality and the facts surrounding them are personally subjective and loaded with assumptions based on clearly formulated facts.
Anna-Maria Marshall[4] notes that this change occurs in framing because our perceptions depend on “new information and experiences”; it is precisely this idea that underlies Ewick and Sibley`s definition of legality – our everyday experiences shape our understanding of the law. The rule of law provides for the availability of rules, laws and legal mechanisms for their implementation. Principle of legality to verify the availability and quality of laws. Legality checks whether a particular behavior is in accordance with the law or not. The concept of legal legitimacy refers to fairness or acceptance of fairness in the law enforcement process. Customary law is the unwritten law based on the legal habit that sets precedents, that is, the repetition of certain legal acts spontaneously and naturally, which, through practice, acquire legal force and give repeated tacit consent through prolonged use. This traditional practice must conform to morality and morality and aim at the conviction that it corresponds to a legal necessity in order to be considered a source of law, since it is protected by customary law. Sin embargo, la costumbre, a más de suplir los vacíos legales, puede llegar a derogar una ley siempre que esta sea inconveniente o perjudicial. Legality in its criminal aspect is a principle of international human rights law and is included in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the imposition of sanctions for offences unlawful under international law or criminally illegal under the “general principles of law recognized by civilized nations” is normally excluded from its scope.
Therefore, the trial and punishment for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity do not violate international law. El reconocimiento diplomático es un concepto similar, mediante el cual un Estado reconoce la existencia como una entidad de otro. El reconocimiento legal varía entre jurisdicciones. A person may be recognized as a doctor, married and divorced, in a jurisdiction; move to another jurisdiction and some or all of these issues are not recognized. The new court, even if it does not recognise the medical qualification as such, may allow it to be used for access to a short qualification course leading to a recognised qualification or may not take it into account in any way. Therefore, it must be concluded that reason will always be above passion, because it allows us to think before acting. Passion only serves to teach us something that neither modernity, nor the passage of time, nor pacts, nor treaties, nor concepts of justice and injustice can teach us: to survive at all costs. The statesman or the one who learns to govern must understand that people have the ability to reason, they are usually fickle and easily fall from the waste of passions, and this can be beneficial to him because he can learn to develop a mandate in which he can control others.
Of their hopes and dreams, of their fears and joys. As I said earlier, everyone has the gift of reason, but they always fall into the trap because, for the most part, they are not magnanimous, but petty and weak. [Citation needed] He is the one who cares about the harmony that must exist between the legal imperative and the entire legal system. This element is the extension of the logical element to the entire legal system. [13] These norms are not only the result of rational elements, but other elements influence their formation, such as political and socio-economic interests, dominant social values and requirements that determine a certain political and legal will, which, as long as it becomes dominant, is applied by the rules of the law. In turn, these norms express these values, concepts and requirements and contain the mechanisms to promote their realization through behaviors that are allowed, prohibited or required in the different areas of social life. Legality can be defined as an act, agreement or contract compatible with the law or the state of legality or illegality in a particular jurisdiction. The legal principle that a defendant cannot be prosecuted for an act which is not declared a criminal offence in that court actually concerns the principle of legality, which is part of the overall concept of legality. [1] [2] In contrast, many written constitutions prohibit the creation of retroactive (usually criminal) laws. However, the ability to remove laws creates its own problems. It is clearly more difficult to determine what constitutes a valid law when a number of laws may pose constitutional question marks.
When a law is declared unconstitutional, the actions of public authorities and individuals who were legal under the invalidated law are retroactively illegal. Such an outcome could not occur under parliamentary sovereignty (or at least not before the factors), since a law was a law and its validity could not be questioned in any court. In the public or political sphere, the idea that the individual has certain rights is generally evoked by being such within or in relation to the political organization (city, state), hence the philosophical concepts of human rights, human rights or moral rights (moral rights) and constitutional rights themselves. Fundamental rights, public freedoms or subjective public rights. In the usual terminology that refers to human or individual rights, a distinction is usually made between civil and political rights and social, economic and cultural rights. Therefore, the normative provisions of each rank must be the result of prior analysis, with the aim of knowing the facts, their causes and effects, the possible regulations, their effects, in order to determine what exact form should be required or promoted, or of the legal institution that wishes to be regulated; Compliance with certain formal requirements in the preparation and compliance with technical legal principles that apply to a particular legal system. In addition, the means and institutions that promote respect for the provision and the rights and obligations arising from such situations must be created, both in the order of the socio-material conditioning resulting from the socio-economic and political regime in force, the bodies necessary for its implementation and the secondary legal provisions necessary for the implementation of the rule of law.